This white balance is usually refered to by 4 values RGGB (Red, Green, Green, Blue) and these values are generally x 1024 1024 y (or x 1 1 y if the values are normalised) and the objective is to achieve a white balance that provide 1024 1024 1024 1024.
I have tried the lens cap method and the method of blowing all the pixels but it doesn't work on my classic 5D.
So I downloaded a file from this site : http://www.guillermoluijk.com/tutorial/uniwb/index_en.htm that was prepared using the magenta chart method described there. There are also lot of other files there for other cameras.
Using this file I obtained the following values : 1015 1024 1024 986
This was good but I was wondering if it is possible to achieve a better result ? And the answer is yes ! After using the method I will describe below I was able to achieve the following values : 1016 1024 1024 1027. using the same downloaded file.
So here is the idea. It's very simple. It consists in using the White Balance SHIFT feature of the camera. This feature allows to correct the white balance.
So after setting the white balance to CUSTOM using the downloaded file, I did 8 shifts of the WB corresponding to the 8 surrounding points around the center of the axis that are displayed in the camera when you call the SHIFT/BRACKETING feature (use SHIFT not BRACKETING).
For each shift position, I took a shot and then using exiftool I wrote the obtained values. This gave me the following table :
- Code: Select all
997:991 1005:968 1016:944
1006:1009 + 1025:961
1016:1027 1024:1003 1034:978
The + represents the center of the axis and around are the values of R and B channels (I don't write the values GG as they are always 1024).
After this first table, I saw that the results are better in the bottom left corner. So I decided to go 2 positions further from the center in that direction and took a serie of other shots and obtained a more complete table :
- Code: Select all
987:1012 997:991 1005:968 1016:944
997:1030 1006:1009 + 1025:961
1006:1049 1016:1027 1024:1003 1034:978
1016:1068 1025:1045 1033:1022 1043:996
So I noticed that there is no better improvement going further.
The best position is the position that offers the smallest distance from the 1024 value in both channels. So in my case it is the position corresponding to 1016:1027.